Mission Critical

Faster Enclosure for Projects That Can’t Afford Delays
Tall blank vertical outdoor sign near leafless trees under blue sky with clouds.

When you’re building a data center or other mission-critical facility, every day matters. Tight schedules, labor constraints and complex coordination leave little room for delays.

‍

The HyperWall™ building enclosure system helps you close buildings faster through a highly engineered, prefabricated approach that reduces field labor, simplifies installation and enables better schedule stacking.

Hyperwall At a Glance

HyperWall panels made for mission critical projects such as data centers offer numerous benefits over alternative materials and formats.

  • Advantages compared to precast concrete
    • ~15% the weight — a typical data center wall weight is 11-16 psf, compared with 80-100 psf for precast
    • Can be installed in 50% less time
    • 7-9 as many panels can be transported per truck
    • At least 50% less embodied carbon in the panel system
  • Typical install rate of approximately 20 panels/day/crane
    • A typical crew can install 200+ panels per week with 2 lightweight cranes.
  • Superior thermal insulation: R-values of at least 2.8 ft²·°F·h/BTU per inch
  • Built-in vapor and moisture barriers
  • Standard panel sizes up to 12 x 41 feet
  • Factory-installed glazing available
  • Complete exterior solution significantly reduces on-site trades

The HyperWall System Versus Precast and IMP

Mission-Critical Priorities The HyperWall System Insulated Precast Concrete Preinsulated Metal Panels (IMP)
Speed to Enclosure Fastest path to dry-in:
  • Install potential of 20+ panels/day/crane
  • Can be tilted up without special rigging or risk of cracking
Slower install rate:
  • ~10 panels/day/crane
  • Requires special rigging to prevent cracking during tilt up
Fast install but often requires more:
  • Secondary framing
  • Trim and envelope detailing
Jobsite Logistics Significantly reduces site congestion:
  • 7-9 panels/truck
  • Smaller crane requirements
Increases site congestion:
  • 1 panel/truck
  • Larger crane footprint
  • More delivery coordination
Moderate logistical impact:
  • Lightweight and easy to ship
  • More field pieces
  • More coordination points
Safety Safer installation profile:
  • Lighter panels
  • Smaller picks and equipment
  • Fewer trucks and people
  • No welding
Lower safety profile:
  • Heavier picks
  • Larger cranes
  • More trucks
  • Higher handling risk
Lightweight, but more field assembly and detailing work can increase exposure hours
Durability Ideal for mission-critical environments:
  • Corrosion resistant
  • Nonconductive
  • Dimensionally stable
  • Field repairable
Durable but more susceptible to:
  • Cracking during tilt up
  • Spalling over time
More vulnerable to:
  • Dents
  • Finish damage
  • Oil canning
  • Long-term joint maintenance
Structure Monolithic wall system:
  • Structure
  • Insulation
  • Environmental control layers
Proven structural system but with significant weight and logistics impacts Primarily an enclosure/cladding system; typically relies on backup structure
Security/Resilience More robust than IMP:
  • Monolithic structural panel is harder to breach
  • Can be engineered for project-specific blast requirements
Strong mass and security benefits but with heavy constructability tradeoffs Lower forced-entry resistance compared with monolithic wall systems
Schedule Stacking Enables better parallel work: smaller cranes and fewer deliveries allow exterior yard work, utilities and pads to progress alongside wall erection Large crane footprint can restrict parallel work and site access Can support fast enclosure, but field detailing and backup framing may limit sequencing gains
Best-Fit Profile Best solution for clients who need to build faster with:
  • Less congestion
  • Safer installs
  • Durable, mission-critical performance
Best for traditional conservative delivery where weight and slower logistics are acceptable Best for lower-risk enclosure needs where upfront simplicity is prioritized over structural/security performance